• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Committee to monitor constitutional issues

By Zedeck Siew

April 22, 2009

PETALING JAYA, 22 April 2009: The Bar Council has formed a constitutional law committee to keep tabs on pressing federal and state-level constitutional issues.


Bon (Courtesy of Edmund Bon)
Committee chairperson Edmund Bon explained that the Bar Council was prompted to form the committee in light of several events in the past year. He cited the troubled relationship between the Barisan Nasional (BN)-ruled federal government and Pakatan Rakyat (PR)-governed states as an example.

“We need to see where the constitution stands with regards to Malaysians, and whether there is a need for reform,” Bon said, adding that it was important to see whether the spirit of the Federal Constitution had been diluted or misinterpreted.

“We may then find the constitution to be totally fine. But this process of examination has to happen.”

Bon explained that the constitutional law committee, which was formed on 11 April and will meet by May to discuss concrete plans, hoped to hold a series of dialogues and symposia that would discuss and educate the public on key constitutional issues. He identified these to be:

Federal and state relations; the extent to which federal and state governments have control over natural resources and matters of public governments; and how tussles such as that between the Selangor state and federal governments over water arise.

The fundamental liberties of Malaysian citizens. Bon noted that Malaysians’ fundamental rights, as guaranteed by Part II of the Federal Constitution, is being “diluted on a daily basis by the judiciary.” He added that there may be a need to infuse international human rights norms into the Malaysian constitution.

Emergency laws, such as the Internal Security Act, as provided for by Articles 149 and 150 of the Federal Constitution. “These may have been relevant in 1957. Are they relevant today?”

The democratic separation of powers of the executive, judiciary and legislature. In the 2007 Public Prosecutor v Kok Wah Kuan case, then Chief Justice Datuk Abdul Hamid Mohamad decided that the separation of powers doctrine is merely a political theory that is not consistently reflected in the constitution.

“From these, we will prepare working papers that will include feedback from our speakers and the public,” Bon said.

These broad perspectives would assist the committee in advising the Bar Council on how to deal with constitutional issues, and help it submit recommendations to the government if amendments are deemed necessary.

The constitutional law committee will seek to partner with academics and constitutional law experts, the Human Rights Commission (Suhakam), and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) that deal with matters pertaining to the constitution; as well as with students who focus on the subject.

Claiming ownership

According to Bon, a further aim by the committee would be to raise public awareness about the framework and content of the Malaysian federal and state constitutions.

He revealed that the Federal Constitution, a 1957 result of the Reid Commission, was drafted after limited public enquiries, but saw no real referendum on its key provisions.

The document has since been subject to rampant amendments; as of 2005, more than 650 individual changes have been passed by Parliament.

“Have these amendments been to the benefit of the people? We need greater public discourse. I think that many people really don’t know enough of what the Federal Constitution means and how it affects them,” Bon said.

“People seem to be afraid of the constitution. This unfortunately results in apathy and ignorance, which is not what any civil society should have.”

Bon added that while there are signs of improvement, the process of raising awareness had to be accelerated.

“The constitution is the supreme law of the land. It is the law that allows us to be here, and establishes our institutions to govern our country. We need to get Malaysians to claim ownership of it. Otherwise, they will be less equipped to stand up to tyranny and oppression.”

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Bar Council, constitutional law committee, Edmund Bon, Federal Constitution, Reid Commission

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. orang kampung says

    April 22, 2009 at 8:48 am

    Its high time the Bar Council stepped in to ensure that the constitution is not raped further by the government.

    The lay person can only voice their frustrations and are not able to engage the government effectively.

    The rakyat wishes the Bar Council godspeed.

  2. cruzeiro says

    April 22, 2009 at 11:24 am

    Is it any wonder that “they” spit on the Federal Constitution on a daily basis?

    Knowing them, they’ll propose that we formulate a new FC, so as to facilitate the perpetuation of the “gangsta rule”, after the mutilation is complete ….

    Actually, for all practical purposes, the Fedral Constitution is dead, as the Judiciary is simply an instrument of the executive, and favours them as a rule – while the relevant bodies play the “politics of silence”.

    Who then is to be blamed for this apathy?

  3. Observer says

    April 22, 2009 at 1:28 pm

    This is another attempt by Pakatan supporters in the Bar Council to use the apolitical Council to advance their objectives. Tell me, who are in this Council? Most if not all are Pakatan sympathisers. Bon himself is on record a lawyer acting for Perak Pakatan in the current tussle with the BN government. To this group of people, the constitution is only good if it works to their advantage.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph