Categorised | Features

PKR’s resignations

WITHIN a month, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) has been rocked with the resignations of high-profile party leaders, including three federal lawmakers. Bayan Baru Member of Parliament (MP) Datuk Seri Zahrain Mohamed Hashim quit in early February 2010, followed by Nibong Tebal MP Tan Tee Beng a fortnight later.

It might have been easy to dismiss their resignations as a by-product of local issues, since both MPs had been publicly attacking Penang Chief Minister Lim Guan Eng. But then on 3 March, a third lawmaker, Mohsin Fadzli Samsuri of Bagan Serai, Perak, quit, citing PKR’s handling of the “Allah” controversy.

These resignations are dramatic, since they alter the parliamentary composition of the Pakatan Rakyat (PR). PKR is now no longer the biggest parliamentary opposition party. The DAP is. What could this do to the power balance within the PR? If the convention is that the opposition leader is chosen from the biggest opposition party, would the PR then need to replace Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim with a DAP MP?

Tan Tee Beng (left) and Zahrain
Is the PR’s parliamentary presence weakened in any way? More importantly, what does this say about PKR? Are these resignations a signal that the party is in turmoil, as some headlines suggest? Or are they merely the latest in the young party’s series of growing pains?

On the other hand, could the resignations not be a good thing for the party to clarify its internal leadership issues?

Non-performing quitters

“Yes and no,” says PKR’s Kuantan MP Fuziah Salleh, when asked if the resignations could actually be a silver lining. “On one hand, it will certainly make my job as party election director easier, since I am responsible for monitoring the KPIs (key performance indicators) of all our MPs.”

According to Fuziah, the KPIs monitored are:

Parliamentary performance: Do PKR’s MPs participate actively in debates, ask questions in their constituencies’ interest, or ask questions of BN MPs and ministers?

Constituency work: Are their service centres accessible and functional? Have they identified local community stakeholders? Do they network and perform regular outreach?

Communications strategies: Do urban MPs make full use of the new media? And do rural MPs have other strategies, such as holding regular ceramah?

“I would say that the three quitters failed in meeting these KPIs,” Fuziah tells The Nut Graph in a phone interview. She adds that these KPIs are not meant to penalise MPs, but to help the party ensure their seats remain winnable in the next elections.

PR disaster?

On the other hand, Fuziah says this string of high-profile resignations could damage public perception in the PR, and specifically in PKR. “We must brace ourselves, because this is exactly what the BN wants,” she says.

Associate Professor Dr Joseph Liow of the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies at Singapore’s Nanyang Technological University agrees. “To be fair to PKR, Umno has itself been identifying ‘weak links’ in the PKR chain, playing up their sense of insecurity or ambition, and picking them off selectively,” he says in an e-mail interview with The Nut Graph.

The question is, why is PKR the party that seems the most insecure or vulnerable among the PR?

“PKR absorbed too many ex-Umno people who retained a selfish and outmoded understanding of politics. These defections actually took too long to happen,” says Dr Ooi Kee Beng of Singapore-based International School of Southeast Asian Studies.

He tells The Nut Graph via e-mail that it would have been much healthier for PKR if these people had shown their lack of staying power at an earlier stage.

“But because of Anwar’s initial concentration on getting crossovers from the BN, the consolidation of the PKR and the PR that should have followed their electoral success did not take place properly,” he says.

Ooi’s reasoning is that these resignations are actually a natural cleaning-up process for PKR. After all, it is a relatively new party. And given how quickly it rose to become Malaysia’s largest opposition party, not all of its leaders would have been up to the job.

“Sooner or later, these defectors were bound to run afoul of what the party stands for,” he explains.

Even if this was true, would these resignations unbalance the PR’s internal power relations? Political scientist Dr Mavis Puthucheary doesn’t think so. “Even if it is the biggest opposition party now, the DAP cannot assume the leading role in PR, because the coalition needs to remain multiracial,” she tells The Nut Graph in a phone interview.

Liow (Pic courtesy of Joseph
“The DAP might be multiracial in philosophy, but it has no significant Malay [Malaysian] membership to qualify as truly multiracial,” she explains. And so, she says, PKR will still be crucial in forming the bridge between the DAP and PAS.

Liow agrees. “I don’t think there will be a major reshuffle at the moment,” he says. “Anwar was [chosen as] de facto head of the opposition because he is Anwar, not because he is from the party with the largest number, or formerly largest number, of parliamentary seats.”

Precarious PKR

All three academics concur that PKR needs to manage this recent crisis well if the PR is to have a fighting chance in the next elections. All three allude to Anwar’s “distractions” and inability to steward the opposition coalition well. Liow says internal discipline is really the deeper issue in PKR that remains unsolved. Ooi says the party needs “courage to cut away dead wood, and pick good people even if [they currently] do not have so-called grassroots support”.

To PKR’s credit, Fuziah says the party introduced a training academy in October 2009 focusing on capacity building of the party’s leadership at all levels. “So far, we have covered half the country, and we have already identified potential leaders and candidates,” she says.

“In 2008, we did not have much of a choice in fielding candidates, but I am confident the next time we will have a better pool of candidates.”

Puthucheary, however, points out the PR’s overall inability to come up with a convincing common platform as a key issue here, a weakness the BN is happy to capitalise on.

“After the March 2008 elections, there was hope that the country was moving away from racial politics, but the reverse has actually taken place,” she says. “Umno has done whatever it can to scare and divide people along racial lines, and it seems to be working.”

And so Puthucheary says if the PR cannot get its act together, then the public is going to ask if there is any real choice between the BN and the PR.

The Nut Graph needs your support
Please take our five-minute reader survey

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “PKR’s resignations”

  1. Fiona Esther says:

    Resignations of the PKR members are signs there is a major crisis in the party. PR has to pull their act together and revisit their original objectives.

    The major impediment now is, the de facto leader, Anwar is too focused to prove his innocence and dismiss his trial.

    These resignations can be attributed to few factors, and here I guess, the most important in my opinion is that, these people are concerned with their positions in the party as well as the future of the party with Anwar having to face the trial.

    No doubt Anwar is a charismatic leader, but with all problems facing him now, I can see that he could not manage his party well. And thus, all the problems arise.

  2. Seven more MPs to go, and BN will have 2/3 majority again.

  3. thokiat says:

    Post of opposition leader is a small matter compared to the bigger challenge where BN will eventually regain 2/3 majority and misuse the advantage.

  4. Is it necessary to get comments from Singapore?

    Just like PKR you seem to draw lopsided comments from those […] who have nothing to do with Malaysia.

    Is this your policy?


    You seem to be confusing the country Singapore with credible institutions and academics who are based there. It is a policy of ours to seek a variety of expert opinions when they are relevant to the piece, yes. Ooi and Liow have specialised in Malaysian politics for yonks, and are credible and reputable academics.

    What you are engaging in is essentially an ad hominem attack against them – you are doing nothing to disprove the merit of their arguments, but rather are targeting irrelevant aspects of their identity or location. But this is not the first time this has happened in public debate in Malaysia 🙂

    Shanon Shah
    Columns and Comments Editor

  5. onesided says:

    Way to go PKR…give all your MPs to BN…what a waste of time…[…]

  6. I am not a member of Umno but I feel disgusted by the way the opposition parties try to clobber the organisation.

    DAP is a racialist political party but so is Umno. Between the two Umno is more rational.

    If the DAP is against Malay [Malaysians] in all respects there is nothing wrong in Umno being likewise.


    Mavis Puthucheary points out the reality of the DAP – it is philosophically multi-racial but in practise does not include enough Malay Malaysians. Umno is philosophically and practically mono-racial.

    Shanon Shah
    Columns and Comments Editor

  7. onesided says:

    Since “Mavis Puthucheary points out the reality of the DAP – it is philosophically multi-racial but in practise does not include enough Malay Malaysians.”

    What do you think the reason is behind this? Don’t you think you owe us an article related to this – purely related to this?


    I’m not following your line of questioning. Just who are you trying to hold accountable here: me, Mavis or the DAP? Meanwhile, if you have any analysis pertaining to this matter, do share here in the comments section or send us a letter to the editor. We’ll publish it if it’s fit to print.

    Shanon Shah
    Columns and Comments Editor

  8. onesided says:

    @Ahmad Shahidan

    Yes, it is necessary to get opinion from outside, because Malaysians don’t believe in themselves. We always listen to other countries, and do what other countries tell us to do…don’t you think so?

  9. Paul for Democracy says:

    I would strongly recommend that ALL members of the State and Federal houses sit up and think why the people voted for them. PLEASE work for the people who voted for you and do what the people want you to do!

  10. mslam says:

    Talking of racist parties, Umno has no challenges. The likes of Ahmad Ismail, Nasir Safar, Umno-friendly Perkasa, cow-head incident [justified] by Umno truly testifies to this.

    If DAP is racist at least they do not show it.

    Umno did through Najib and Hishamuddin’s keris raising and defending the Biro Tata Negara well-known for their racists lectures.

  11. kingmaker says:


    Maybe “onesided” wants all three parties, you, Mavis and DAP, to elaborate further why there’s not enough Malay Malaysian in a multiracial DAP…perhaps the Malay Malaysians are racist? Just like the Chinese Malaysian and Indian Malaysian? You think so?


    Thanks for your speculation, @kingmaker, but I’d prefer to hear from “onesided”.

    Shanon Shah
    Columns and Comments Editor

  12. muslim says:

    As advertised, DAP hopes to be a modern, liberal organisation representing everyone in MALAYSIA, regardless of race and religion. But the similarity of this liberal outfit with its sibling in Singapore, even now, is much too close. Even their names sound alike.

    Theories and philosophies are, just that, theories and philosophies. The fact remains that Singapore’s Malays are generally, “naturally” marginalised in the meritocracy system. And it is glaringly noticable too.

    So having said that, its no wonder that, other than the handful of the most “brave” and “cosmopolitan” types, most Malay [Malaysians] just wouldn’t bother to venture into subscribing to DAP’s protections.

Most Read in Features

Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found




  • The Nut Graph


Switch to our mobile site