• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Wong’s arrest stifles academic freedom

By Gan Pei Ling

May 13, 2009

PETALING JAYA, 13 May 2009: Academics from the Asian Public Intellectual (API) Fellowships Program have described political scientist Wong Chin Huat‘s recent arrest for sedition as an “assault against academic freedom”.

The group of public intellectuals said in a statement today that Wong’s arrest under the Sedition Act on 5 May restricted the academic community’s participation in civil society.

“Dissent is increasingly not tolerated. Any fair and legitimate challenge to injustice and foul play is simply demonised by the government. We…regard this as a grave danger to the future of Malaysia and all Malaysians,” said 13 API fellows.

Among others, the API fellows who signed the statement were film director Amir Muhammad, Centre for Policy Initiatives director Dr Lim Teck Ghee, and former Penang state executive councillor Dr Toh Kin Woon.

The API fellows urged the government to drop all charges against Wong who was released on police bail on 8 May after three days of being locked up.

They also urged the government to keep its word about opening up spaces for all Malaysians to voice their dissent, not quell criticism through coercion.

“We all know that academic freedom is an essential ingredient in any plan to uplift academic standards. Coming at a time when our country’s universities have to redouble their efforts to raise standards, this action of the police is demoralising to the academic community,” said the API fellows.

They added that Wong did nothing wrong beyond exercising his right as a citizen to engage in a social movement that was committed to the conduct of clean, free and fair elections.

“His arrest and detention are an attack by the government against the fundamental and inalienable right of a citizen, as enshrined in the Federal Constitution,” they said.

Wong was arrested under Section 4(1)(a) of the Sedition Act for calling on Malaysians to wear black to protest against the “ongoing Perak coup” by the Barisan Nasional government.

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: academic, amir muhammad, Asian Public Intellectual, freedom, Lim Teck Ghee, sedition, Toh Kin Woon, Wong Chin Huat

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. fikri roslan says

    May 13, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    Yes, we are entitled to all kinds of freedoms and rights. But these freedoms and rights come with limits. As long as you are not disturbing others, then you are free to exercise your rights. So do not complain when others exercise their right to complain, and the police exercise their duty. So there is also a limit how much freedom you can exercise. A mMalay proverb says, “Ada ubi ada batas”.

  2. chinhuatw says

    May 20, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    How would wearing black disturb others?

  3. chinhuatw says

    May 20, 2009 at 5:48 pm

    Siapa yang makan cili, dia rasa pedas.

    Berani kerana benar, takut kerana salah.

  4. black says

    May 21, 2009 at 1:00 am

    wearing black underwear will upset “Superman”

  5. abdul hakim bujang says

    May 21, 2009 at 10:20 am

    Najib said: “We’re ruling with a three-seat majority. The PAS state government of Kelantan, for 2½ years was ruling Kelantan with a one-seat majority, and that particular seat was won by two votes.”

    “But they hung on for 2½ years because we respected the process. We respected the majority. In this case, there’s one side that’s refusing to acknowledge this.

    “Can I ask a question: if Anwar had succeeded on Sept 16 last year, you think he would have called for fresh elections?”

  6. chinhuatw says

    May 21, 2009 at 11:52 am

    If someone has threatened to rob you, does it justify you robbing the person in return?

    I have my track record opposing Anwar’s September 16 plan. Can you or Umno be as congruent as myself on this matter?

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph