• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Three detained under ISA

By Deborah Loh

April 17, 2009

KUALA LUMPUR, 17 April 2009: Three individuals were arrested under the Internal Security Act (ISA) even as 13 detainees were released by new Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak.

However, according to the Anti-ISA Movement or Gabungan Mansuh ISA (GMI), the arrests were not ordered by Najib’s administration as at least two were made prior to his swearing-in as prime minister on 3 April.

The three arrested are Agus Salim, 32, an Indonesian who was detained on 5 March in Johor. He was a cook who had just finished performing his prayers when he was served the arrest order. According to GMI, there were five police cars to escort the detainee, and the arrest was captured on video by the police.

Another detainee, Abdul Matin Anol Rahmat, 60, was taken in on 1 April in Ulu Tiram, Johor Baru. Twelve police officers were present during his arrest. He is suspected of being a Jemaah Islamiyah member.

The third detainee is Johar Hassan, on whom GMI could not obtain any information.

GMI presented a memorandum on the arrests to the Malaysian Human Rights Commission (Suhakam) at their office in Kuala Lumpur today. Commissioner Datuk N Siva Subramaniam received the memorandum from GMI chief Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh.


Syed Ibrahim
“We note that the first 60 days under ISA is a period of intimidation and physical and mental torture on the detainees. These arrests have not been announced by the police or government to the media. Their families are in the dark about their condition and where they are being held,” Syed Ibrahim said.

GMI, an umbrella body for 83 non-governmental organisations, wants the government to either free the three immediately or produce them in court to be charged.

Suhakam commissioner Siva said it was unusual for the government not to announce the detentions. “Usually, the agency concerned such as the Home Ministry will do so. The secrecy is disturbing,” he told The Nut Graph.

He said Suhakam will contact the Home Ministry to find out about the three detainees’ well-being and the reasons for their arrests.

“Suhakam has never agreed with the ISA as it is against fundamental human rights, as is other detention-without-trial laws such as the Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969 and the Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985. Detainees should be charged and given the opportunity to answer,” Siva said.

GMI has also asked Suhakam to renew its call to the government to abolish the ISA, which the human rights body did in 2003. Suhakam had suggested that a new act, a Terrorism Act, be implemented instead, but this was not taken up by the government nor tabled in Parliament.

“There are other laws that can be used that do not take away the right to trial and the right for a person to defend him- [or her]self,” Syed Ibrahim said.

Commenting on Najib’s promise in his inaugural speech as prime minister to review the ISA, Syed Ibrahim said, “The ISA ought to be abolished, not reviewed.”

Najib had said this on 3 April, besides announcing the release of 13 ISA detainees including two Hindu Rights Action Force (Hindraf) leaders.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Dangerous Drugs (Special Preventive Measures) Act 1985, Emergency (Public Order and Prevention of Crime) Ordinance 1969, Internal Security Act, release of ISA detainees

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Main says

    April 19, 2009 at 10:57 pm

    This ISA thing is quite disturbing concerning the execution of law and order. The trial might take a few “moments” to take place and in due course, other cases which might need more attention could arise. To abolish something which is needed is something unreasonable. We do not know when we are going to need it.

    And if the current situation prevails where everybody wanting to be heard and attended, any ideas which effective laws to implement?

  2. Eric says

    April 20, 2009 at 4:43 pm

    @Main
    “To abolish something which is needed is something unreasonable.”
    Is the alleged need proven?

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2025 The Nut Graph