• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

The opposition label

Ampersand by KW Mak

January 17, 2011

IN the course of serving as a councillor in the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) for more than two years, I have been viewed as the “opposition” by some of my colleagues.

Though none have said this to me personally, they find other tongue-in-cheek ways of making it known. For example, one councillor who sat next to me during a meeting declared, “I’m sitting in the opposition bench.”

I suppose this viewpoint stems from the fact that I am often at odds with some of the decisions my fellow councillors make, especially when it comes to property development project approvals. Let me explain how.


Table talk

Since my reputation for opposing project approvals precedes me, some property developers seek to negotiate privately with me in advance before their projects are brought to the objection-hearing stage. They are keen to show off their development blueprints and tell me the exorbitant amounts they wish to spend to upgrade the infrastructure of the surrounding neighbourhood.

To further strengthen their argument, they say that PJ is an aging township that needs to be redeveloped to help generate more economic activities.

When I state that their projects do not adhere to the requirements of statutory documents like the National Physical Plan, they will tell me that if they were to comply with all the rules, property prices would skyrocket.

They tell me that such cost-cutting measures only benefit the consumer, since the developer can pass on the savings.

Consequences

What the developers fail to mention are the problems that property buyers inherit when rules are not followed. High-rise properties without strata-titles; non-issuance of Certificates of Fitness or Certificate of Completion and Compliance, which prevents legal occupancy of a building; and landslide tragedies that are brushed off as an act of God. These are among the common issues related to development projects that do not follow the rules.

These problems are not felt by the developers, who would have sold off the property and moved on to their next project, leaving the mess for the government to clean up.

Wild goose chase
Wild goose chase

It does not help that the government machinery is not a cohesive structure and often sends complainants on a wild goose chase. In fact, I have a litany of complaint letters and emails from irate buyers who feel victimised by an uncaring government system.

Loyalty

Invariably, my stand on issues would generate complaints to the DAP higher-ups about how I do not “toe the line” whenever I object to requests for approvals. Many even question my loyalty to the Pakatan Rakyat (PR).

The argument goes along the lines of how I am working counter to PR policies by objecting to development projects that other councillors approve of.

The DAP higher-ups have thus far not seen the need to reprimand me, while some have even messaged me their support. Regardless, I think it is best that I state clearly where my loyalties are exactly.

One of the core concepts that the PR was founded on is to serve the public, and the term “Ketuanan Rakyat” that the PR is so fond of saying at political rallies is supposed to reflect this.

Similarly, when I was appointed as a councillor, I took an oath to serve the public, and I have no intention of breaking that oath. But somehow, serving the public’s interest by adhering to the rules appears to put me in the “opposition”.

KW Mak is a DAP-appointed councillor in MBPJ who believes that the truest test of a good government is its ability to stand up to public scrutiny.

Filed Under: Columns Tagged With: Ampersand, councillor, dap, KW Mak, mbpj, National Physical Plan, Pakatan Rakyat

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Andrew I says

    January 17, 2011 at 11:05 am

    Well, our good friends in the BN have said that there is a difference between being the opposition and actually running the country. In the urban states like Penang and Selangor, if you were stick to strict governance, you’d be seen as anti-development, something which, no doubt, our good friends in the BN will exploit to the hilt.

    Sleeping with the enemy i.e. the developers, makes it a rock and a hard place situation for PR. These profit maximisers are the antithesis of social well being, but the sad fact is that many view new buildings as signs of the great leap forward. There’s really no need for maintenance, just build a new one.

    Things like strata titles become luck of the draw, a bit like the wild wild west: you have the sheriff but you still have to thank God that another day has passed by without you being shot dead.

  2. pj_guy says

    January 17, 2011 at 1:59 pm

    Hi Mr Mak, please continue to do what you are doing. Growing up here in PJ, all too often we have seen many crazy things that go beyond the interests of residents and more towards those who only have moneymaking on their mind without regard for how things should be done properly.

    Thank you for keeping us in the know about what is happening in the council. Appreciate it and I hope we as residents can do something, too.

  3. Fern says

    January 18, 2011 at 7:24 pm

    Thank you for standing up for the rakyat when everyone else is very complacent. It’s good to know we have people like you who do their job right.

  4. Bundle of Crap says

    January 25, 2011 at 12:54 am

    Opposition within the ruling coalition? A great change […]. If you find things wrong with how the Council operates, as a local councillor, do continue to voice out your disagreement! Don’t let those snide and childish remarks by other[s] hold you back on voicing out discrepancies within the Council. […] Big thanks!

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2025 The Nut Graph