THIS month has been a particularly significant one for The Nut Graph team. It is not only Ramadan and the month of Merdeka. It also marks our two-year anniversary and the month when we transform our operations into Plan B.
While there’s constantly new beginnings to look forward to, these moments give us pause to look back on the highlights that make Malaysian political and cultural life memorable, poignant or significant.
And so, as we mark our 53rd anniversary as an independent nation, The Nut Graph celebrates, in no particular order, the following 10 individuals, groups and initiatives in the second annual Merdeka Awards. These are individuals and groups who boldly articulate their vision for Malaysia and put action to words, sometimes at personal risk and usually with personal sacrifice. They are awardees for having enriched the nation in some way.
We do not claim that this list is definitive or exhaustive in any way. Indeed, these are our picks. We welcome readers to include theirs in the comments section to make the picture complete.
He was the 2007 Freedom Film Festival winner for 10 Tahun Sebelum Merdeka, a revelatory documentary about the nation’s untold history of the years leading up to our independence.
His current project researching the golden age of Malaysia’s student movement during the 1960s is no less significant. Fahmi’s Student Power! is a riveting multimedia lecture. It narrates how autonomous and vibrant the Malaysian student movement was in holding the state accountable until the government suppressed it with the Universities and University Colleges Act.
As if to prove the point that student activism will not be tolerated, Fahmi has been repeatedly barred from presenting his lecture to students at Universiti Malaya, the place where the student movement was born. However, he remains undeterred.
As a people’s historian who is connected to today’s youths, Fahmi is not only showing us which parts of our history have been suppressed, he is also making our history come alive by connecting the past to the present.
Benjamin McKay and Amir Muhammad
Benjamin McKay was a beloved writer, lecturer and academic with a deep passion for Malaysian, particularly Malay, film. He died of a cardiac arrest in July.
McKay, an Australian who made a home in Kuala Lumpur, wasn’t just a respected Malaysia film critic. He was also loved for encouraging his readers and students to critically engage with their culture, politics and society. And for a foreigner, his love for Malaysia was clearly demonstrated in his intellectual and social engagement of the country’s culture and politics.
Amir Muhammad is an independent filmmaker, writer and publisher who addresses social political issues in his films and books. Already, two of his films, Apa Khabar Orang Kampung and The Last Communist, have been banned in Malaysia. (The Home Ministry has also confiscated copies of the queer anthology he published, Body 2 Body.)
As the author of Yasmin Ahmad’s Films and 120 Malay Movies, he continues the public discourse on Malaysian movies and film-making in this country.
With their shared love and passion for films made during the Golden Age of Malaysian cinema, both McKay and Amir held numerous conversations about the topic and eventually became friends. Both deserve The Nut Graph‘s Merdeka Award for their work and dedication to keeping the subject of Malaysian films intelligent and vibrant.
Sisters in Islam
They have been called un-Islamic and branded “dangerous”. They have even been sued over the use of “Islam” in their organisation’s name. Critics have also lodged multiple reports against the women’s rights group as if they were somehow a threat to security.
But Sisters in Islam, informally formed in 1988 and officially registered in 1993, remains undeterred in their efforts to address the injustices and discrimination faced by Muslim women in the name of syariah.
In 2008, with researchers from Malaysian universities, they embarked on a study of the effects of polygamy. The results of the study, a first of its kind, were released in 2010. The study casts doubt on whether husbands in polygamous marriages are able to treat their wives and children equally as intoned by the Quran.
With their unwavering advocacy work, the group continues to fight for women’s rights within the Islamic framework, and they remain committed to demonstrating that Islam is a religion that is just, fair, merciful and compassionate.
The Penan Support Group (PSG)
In 2009, a government task force report confirmed that Penan women and children in Sarawak were raped and sexually abused by timber workers. The sexual violations were first revealed by the Bruno Manser Foundation in 2008.
It took the national task force a year to confirm the rapes and sexual abuse, including of children as young as 10, by truck drivers of timber companies. Despite the report and evidence, Sarawak government leaders repeatedly refuse to acknowledge the issue. No one has been arrested or charged with the crimes thus far, either.
Several non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have pooled their resources to form the Penan Support Group (PSG) to assist the Penan survivors and provide information to the police. The PSG, now comprising 36 NGOs, has been unwavering in its efforts to seek justice and support for the Penan. They kept the spotlight on the issue with their fact-finding mission and follow-up report, A Wider Context of Sexual Exploitation of Penan Women and Girls in Middle and Ulu Baram, Sarawak, where they detailed in Parliament that seven more Penan women had been sexually abused.
When their report was refuted by Women, Family and Community Development Deputy Minister Heng Seai Kie, the PSG railed against these denials. Under an avalanche of denials and the attempts to sweep the Penan rapes under the carpet, the PSG’s continued work is critical in protecting vulnerable and marginalised Malaysians.
Centre of Environment, Technology and Development, Malaysia (Cetdem)
This environmental group celebrates its 25th anniversary this year. Under the leadership of veteran environmentalist Gurmit Singh, Cetdem has been committed to promoting sustainable development by developing and maintaining projects that deal with energy, climate change and organic farming.
Indeed, the organisation began its Mobilising Malaysians on Climate Change project in 2002, long before climate change became a popular buzzword. Cetdem continues to organise seminars, the popular Hari Organik, and exhibitions, as well as critically examine national policies on development.
What’s next? It aims to establish a think-tank which will look at environmental solutions that marry sustainable development with green technology. It also plans to deepen its work on transportation issues, a pet subject and concern of Gurmit’s, who famously still relies on his bicycle and public transportation. With its insistence on practical technological and scientific solutions, as well as its community approach, Cetdem continues to do important work on sustainability.
The Green Surf Coalition
It was a question on many people’s minds: “Why are we building a coal power plant when we are moving towards a national green agenda?” Once some feisty environmentalists and passionate Sabahans found out that there were plans to build a coal-fired power plant in Lahad Datu, they sprung into action.
Galvanising green groups, NGOs and individuals, they formed the Green Surf Coalition. Their protests have been vocal and have used postcards, petitions, Facebook, Twitter and blogs. This anti-coal power coalition has not only shown what social media and networking can do to help get their message across, they have made inroads into Parliament. They managed to persuade Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia to set aside time to debate the controversial plant in Sabah.
The 300MW plant was first proposed several years ago but cancelled twice due to protests. But now it’s been listed in the 10th Malaysia Plan as one of several high-impact projects to be completed by 2015. The plant is to be built near one of Sabah’s most pristine marine sites.
Green Surf’s protests appear to be making an impact. The prime minister himself said public views on the project would be sought. At the same time, coalition members are considering legal action over the plant. Whatever happens, we are guessing that Green Surf is not about to sit back quietly over the issue.
Merely bringing up his name raises all manner of debate on the state of politics and politicians in the country. But whether one likes, loathes or is indifferent towards Umno Youth chief Khairy Jamaluddin, it is hard to ignore him.
After winning the coveted wing’s leadership, he went on to surprise and shock by doing the unthinkable within Umno: calling for his party to ditch “ketuanan Melayu” in favour of “Malay leadership”. He also argued for meritocracy and competition in the face of fundamentalist forces within and outside the party that continue to demand for “Malay rights”.
In his maiden policy speech as Umno youth head, Khairy urged Malay Malaysians to defend the rights of all Malaysians, saying this would only encourage mutual respect.
As a savvy user of social media networking, the politician has also engaged youths, critics and his political rivals within and outside of cyberspace. Through these engagements, Khairy continues to show that he isn’t what Malaysians might expect of a traditional ultra-Malay Umno Youth chief. He has even been openly critical of the cabinet, bluntly describing the cabinet’s decision to disallow local university students from joining political parties as “gutless” and “outdated”.
Whether it is a calculated crafting of a new image, or a genuine attempt to move beyond racial politics, Khairy is on our list for boldly going where no contemporary Umno politician has gone before.
Post-2008 saw a flurry of politicking, rhetoric and jostling among political parties in the changed political landscape. But one Tiger of Jelutong remained steadfast in his beliefs, often at odds with his colleagues.
In 2009, Karpal Singh said the DAP should seriously consider getting out of the Pakatan Rakyat after Opposition Leader Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim openly encouraged crossovers. A lone voice in the DAP, he also said, “Anwar Ibrahim must repent for his action, and Pakatan Rakyat should look for a new leader and not one that promotes party hopping.”
That is not all. Staying true to his principles, he has also taken PAS and Anwar to task on the idea of an Islamic state, and called PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang an “embarassment” over proposed unity talks with Umno. And on 28 Aug 2010, Karpal once again remained adamant in his opposition to PAS’s suggestion that hudud could eventually be implemented in Malaysia.
A motor vehicle accident in 2005 has since left Karpal using a wheelchair and with neuromotor problems in his right arm. But personal adversity has not dampened the politician’s fervour for public duty. Whatever the topic, the politician has been consistent and vocal about his principles as a politician, no matter the risk.
Joshua Wong and Chou Z Lam
Two Malaysian journalists working within the confines of the controlled traditional media stood up for journalistic ethics and integrity at personal cost in 2010.
Joshua Wong, who was an ntv7 producer, quit the Umno-linked television network after network bosses opted to restrict his show from discussing several national issues because of political interference. He didn’t just quit, he also publicly spoke up against political controls within his newsroom.
Chou Z Lam, a TV2 producer, revealed that his nine-part documentary on the Bakun Dam’s social impact was taken off the air due to political interference. He was later fired.
Both have also spoken up about the serious problems of self-censorship in Malaysian journalism. The two have pretty much disassembled Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak‘s declaration that “the press is free to report on pretty much anything”.
Epic – Voice Your Choice
There are currently five million unregistered voters aged 30 and below. Instead of waiting for the Election Commission to make concrete efforts to encourage the young to vote, a group of youths known as Extraordinary People Impacting Community (Epic) decided to launch Voice Your Choice.
Originally a group predominantly focused on helping the Orang Asli, Epic is aiming to register two million voters by the next general election through Voice Your Choice. The project is targeting the younger generation.
Within months of the initiative’s launch in April 2010, the group managed to get 22,000 new Malaysian voters registered. Stressing that they are strictly nonpartisan, Epic has organised groups of volunteers to set up booths in high-traffic malls to register new voters. Will they be successful? Time will tell, but thanks to Epic, the ball has started rolling.
The Nut Graph needs your support
This page was so well done. This should be shared as much as we can. We Malaysian youth know too little about the country.
Oh please TNG, please, please, please — we are NOT 53 years old!
We are 47 years old — Malaysia came to existence in 1963!
Is there a reason why you are perpetuating this fallacy? Or did you just make a factual mistake?
Nick Choo says
If you read the article carefully, we said we are celebrating our 53rd year as an independent nation, NOT 53 years of being Malaysia. TNG commemorates 16 Sept as the anniversary of the formation of Malaysia, and in fact – if you check out our Malaysia Day Awards linked in the related posts above – we’ve called for greater recognition of 16 Sept as the true birthday of our country.
Hi, this is interesting… and thank you for your reply.
My English is bad. And I am sorry if my ignorance irritates TNG.
So, an “independent nation” does not mean Malaysia? And “Malaysia” does not mean an independent nation? So, you mean “TNG commemorates 16 Sept as the anniversary of the formation of Malaysia” BUT NOT the formation of an independent nation? Ok, I´m confused.
Waaiit-a-minute… I got it! Maybe TNG is of the view that when 3 independent nations (let´s forget Singapore for the moment) unite to form Malaysia, there comes into existence four independent nations, namely, Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak, and Malaysia? (I wonder what Sabahans have to say about that.)
Nick Choo, it is quite clear, contextually (among the examples: “And so, as we mark our 53rd anniversary as an independent nation, The Nut Graph celebrates, in no particular order, the following 10 individuals, groups and initiatives in the second annual Merdeka Awards. These are individuals and groups who boldly articulate their vision for Malaysia and put action to words, sometimes at personal risk and usually with personal sacrifice. They are awardees for having enriched the nation in some way.”) and literally (there are 8 “Malaysia”, 15 “Malaysian”, 3 “nation”, and 4 “national” words used in this article), that TNG was referring to the same thing in this article, i.e. Malaysia.
If TNG was not using the terms “independent nation” and “Malaysia” interchangeably in this article, then perhaps TNG should have specified the name of the “independent nation” that TNG was writing about in the article.
According to the Oxford English Dictionary, the notion of political unity and political independence is the contemporary meaning of the term “nation”. Perhaps, if there is another contemporary meaning, or another independent nation within Malaysia, please enlighten us.
BTW, I didn´t have to read the article carefully — it´s quite clear what the article was written about.
@ Nick Choo
Here´s another point of view you might want to consider.
Perhaps when writing articles about merdeka in relation to “Malaysia”, you might want to consider the feelings of people similar to the contributor to the comment in the hyperlink, above, that “Malaysians, particularly those in the peninsula, must realise that no one is attempting to reduce the significance of Aug 31, 1957. Yes, it is a historic day. But it is of no real significance to Sabah, or Sarawak for that matter. It is purely a peninsular phenomenon. Insisting on Aug 31 as ‘National Day’ and Sept 16 as ‘Malaysia Day’ does not make sense. If ‘National Day’ and ‘Malaysia Day’ refer to the date Malaysia as a nation came into existence, then that date is Sept 16, 1963. It is an insult to the intelligence of Sabahans to be told otherwise. It also adds to the mood of talking down to Sabahans to ‘toe the line’, rather than acknowledging that all Malaysians paint the line together.”
Did I hear Lim Guan Eng mentioned? No?
“And so, as we mark our 53rd anniversary as an independent nation, The Nut Graph celebrates, in no particular order, the following 10 individuals, groups and initiatives in the second annual Merdeka Awards.”
Hello, there are 12 individuals, groups and initiatives. No wonder you guys are shutting down. So much for checking your facts.
Actually, there are 7 named individuals in the ten awards given out — alongside groups, initiatives, etc 😀
Kong Kek Kuat says
Hey come on dude, that kind of comment should be reserved for moral prostitutes like Utusan Melayu.
Overall Champion should be YB Karpal Singh followed by Sisters In Islam.
Can I nominate The Nut Graph for a Merdeka Award? The team cannot nominate themselves, and so I’m doing it for them. Great job TNG!
Aizuddin Danian says
Your choice of Khairy as a champion of race-neutral politics in Malaysia is an interesting choice. His definition of racism seems selective, and not unlike other Malay leaders, he is overly sensitive to the term, making even the slightest offence seem bigger than it really is.
See his response to the latest Namewee video. A progressionist would seek engagement, rather than outright call for punishment.
Racism is an ideology. You do not beat it by punishing its offenders.
A true champion would not need to be told this.
My full response to KJ’s call for Namewee’s head can be viewed here:
Ai Tze says
Can’t you see this is TNG’s ploy to get the head of KJ?
Who in UMNO would support someone who is being championed by TNG?
Ibrahim Ali, Brown Power!!!!
Sang Kancil says
“These are individuals and groups who boldly articulate their vision for Malaysia and put action to words, sometimes at personal risk and usually with personal sacrifice. They are awardees for having enriched the nation in some way.”
By your mentioned criteria, Khairy fails them miserably. Certainly cliches cannot be confused with bold vision, nor did KJ face any personal risk or personal sacrifice (unless you count not getting a comfy Deputy Minister job!). And no, KJ did not enrich the nation in anyway, besides continuing to contribute to the laughing stock perception of the country.