• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

“Rulers can be prosecuted because of Umno”

By Zedeck Siew

February 16, 2009

PETALING JAYA, 16 Feb 2009: The legal amendments that made it possible to prosecute the Malay Rulers originated from an Umno-led government in 1993, Tan Sri Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah has pointed out.


Razaleigh (Public domain; source: Wikipedia)
Commenting on Karpal Singh’s call to bring the Perak Sultan to court and the charges that have been levelled against the DAP chairperson, Razaleigh said Karpal was acting within his rights because of past constitutional amendments spearheaded by Umno.

“Mr Karpal Singh, though I disagree with him, was acting well within rights that an Umno-led government enacted in 1993,” Razaleigh wrote on his blog today.

“Was greater harm done to the sovereignty of the Rulers in 1993 through Parliament or a week ago on the streets of Perak?” asked Razaleigh, referring to the protests against Sultan Azlan Shah’s decision to appoint a Barisan Nasional state government instead of dissolving the state assembly.

The Umno veteran urged the people to reflect on the irony of Umno’s current calls to defend the monarchy, and criticisms of the Pakatan Rakyat’s “disrespect” towards Sultan Azlan Shah.

Razaleigh pointed out that the Rulers’ legal immunity was removed following reports of the then Johor Sultan’s physical assault of a hockey coach in 1992.

“I opposed these amendments,” Razaleigh said, but added that the amendments were passed because “Rulers and Parliament were railroaded by the government of the day.”

Further amendments to the constitution by Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s administration in 1994 allowed any bill passed by both Dewan Rakyat and Dewan Negara to become law within 30 days, regardless of the Agong’s consent.

“Is today’s Umno, with its inconsistent adherence to the rule of law, its inconstant respect for the key institutions of our country, a credible or effective defender of the Rulers and of the laws upholding this institution?

“Or do we actually harm what we claim to protect?” he wrote.

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Agong's consent, Karpal Singh, Ku Li, Malay Rulers, Parliament, Tan Sri Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah, Umno

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kaizer Yap says

    February 16, 2009 at 9:21 pm

    Tengku, I salute you.You have not changed since I have know you; your style of speaking without fear or favour is great.

    Your old friend, Kaizer

  2. abubaker says

    February 16, 2009 at 9:56 pm

    “Rulers can be prosecuted because of Umno”.
    I wonder if TV3 and Utusan Malaysia have the courage to speak the truth in their NEWS.

  3. ceong2000 says

    February 16, 2009 at 10:41 pm

    A good leader on the wrong side. I really support of what you said. It’s time that we should only have a multi-racial party consisting of Malaysians and Umno should change its name to United Malaysians National Organisation. It would get full support from all races.

  4. xgovtservant says

    February 17, 2009 at 8:53 pm

    Our country is ruled by the people. The people elect their representatives according to the parties they represent. It is only right that they go back to the people when they change parties. If they are so sure that people elected them because of their own policies then prove it at the by-election. The law must be amended to allow for representatives who have left the party to re-contest. This is especially vital if they is going to be a change of government. Like in the case of not filling a casual vacancy if it falls two years before the expiry of the state assembly, the vacant seat need not be filled if there is no likelihood of change of government.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2025 The Nut Graph