Categorised | Columns

FAQs on climate change

(Pic by Spekulator /

COP15 was a failure. Does this mean Planet Earth is doomed?

No. Planet Earth will survive even if we cross our climate system’s tipping point and trigger runaway climate change. In tackling climate change, it’s not the earth we’re trying to save. It’s ourselves and other species that could possibly go extinct together with us.

Does that mean humanity is doomed? Honestly, it really depends on what we do collectively in the next five to 10 years. Instead of pointing fingers at one another, governments, businesses, and civil society need to engage and work with each other.

Global emissions can only peak until 2015 before it must start falling if we are to limit global warming within 2°C compared to 1900 or pre-industrial levels. However, global emissions are still on the rise, and if we allow ourselves to continue with business as usual, it is unlikely we will be able to cap emissions in time.

So what if global temperatures increase by a few degrees?

This may not be the most accurate analogy but should be close enough: compare the earth to our human body. What happens to us when our body temperature increases by a few degrees Celsius?

A few degrees increase to the global temperature may not sound like much, but according to scientific predictions, it is enough to cause catastrophic changes to our climate, severely disrupt food production, increase water stress, and result in significant extinctions worldwide. Definitely not a world we would want our children to live in.

Click for bigger view (Source: International Projects People Consulting,

For more details, check out the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Fourth Assessment Report released in 2007.

What is the relationship between the Kyoto Protocol and COP15?

The story began with the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), which aims to stabilise greenhouse gas concentrations in the atmosphere to prevent “dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system”. Ratified by 192 countries to date, it came into force in 1994. The first Conference of the Parties (COP) to the UNFCCC was held in 1995.

Subsequently, the Kyoto Protocol was adopted at COP3 in Japan in 1997. Recognising that industrialised nations are primarily responsible for the climate crisis, those who have ratified the protocol are legally bound to reduce their emissions. So the Kyoto Protocol was the UNFCCC’s first child.

At COP15 in Copenhagen, Denmark in December 2009, governments were supposed to finalise the targets for industrialised nations for the second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol. The protocol does not expire in 2012, as has been frequently misreported in the media; it is the first commitment period under the protocol that will be expiring in 2012.

More importantly, governments were supposed to come to an agreement on how to effectively implement the UNFCCC based on the Bali Road Map adopted in 2007. Key issues such as technology transfer, finance, deforestation, etc. were supposed to be resolved at COP15. As we know, that didn’t happen. We can hope that a deal will be sealed at COP16 in Mexico in 2010, but how sure are we that world leaders will not let us down again?

Obama (Public domain / Wiki
Has the US signed the Kyoto Protocol now that Barack Obama is president? Why not?

No, it is unlikely that the US will sign the Kyoto Protocol even though its current president Barack Obama recognises that, “Rolling back the tide of a warming planet is a responsibility that we have to ourselves, to our children, and all of those who will inherit God’s creation long after we are gone.

During a diplomatic visit to Turkey in August 2009, Obama said, “It doesn’t make sense for the United States to sign Kyoto because Kyoto is about to end [in 2012].”

The truth is, the US is unlikely to ratify any treaty unless China is also on board on equal terms. Under the Kyoto Protocol, China was not required to commit to any legally binding targets as it is a developing country.

What happens now that COP15 is over?

The negotiations will resume at COP16 in Mexico in 2010.

As for civil societies and citizens who were disappointed with the outcome of COP15, they need to pick up the pieces and start moving on. More needs to be done; it’s too early to give up and believe we are doomed.

What can citizens and concerned groups do about climate change since political leaders globally failed to find real solutions?

Before COP15, over 5,200 actions were organised in 181 countries on 24 Oct 2009 to call for strong action and bold leadership on the climate crisis. In the midst of negotiations, people again organised vigils and rallies worldwide to remind leaders about the need for a strong deal out of COP15. More than 100,000 people took to the streets in Copenhagen on 12 Dec 2009. Malaysians have organised actions both on 24 Oct and 12 Dec in solidarity with the global community.

The public pressure was there, but it was insufficient to sway political will. Swiftly after the disappointing closure of COP15, global climate alliance TckTckTck and its partners, including, Greenpeace and WWF, announced that they were “not done yet“. Indeed, we need to keep the pressure on our political leaders.

Protest in Cophenhagen on 12 Dec 2009

Additionally, we can pressure businesses to go green by boycotting products with too much packaging, which are not energy-efficient, not reusable or not recyclable. Write to the companies to voice out your concerns so they may improve. There are so many things citizens and concerned groups can do: rethink our way of life, change our own lifestyle and mindset, remain informed, spread awareness.

As philosopher James Garvey argued: “Maybe the solution never was a deal at Copenhagen — who really thinks that climate change has just one big answer? What we need are a billion different solutions, perhaps billions of little revolutions in thinking and acting all over the world. The good news is that such things do not depend on a handful of negotiators sitting around a table. What matters are people like you and me who see the world for what it is and do something about it. There’s room for a little hope still, the hope that even though our leaders fail to do the right thing, the rest of us will either push them into action or get on with it without them.”

Gan Pei Ling was in Copenhagen for COP15 in December 2009. Her trip was made possible by sponsorships from Universiti Tunku Abdul Rahman, the Selangor government, and the US Embassy in Kuala Lumpur. The opinions, findings and conclusions stated in her writings are her own and do not necessarily reflect those of the sponsors.

For related stories, see In the Spotlight: Climate Change

The Nut Graph needs your support
Please take our five-minute reader survey

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “FAQs on climate change”

  1. RSI says:

    Take 30mins+ of video viewing here and find out for yourselves (especially you Ms Gan) if Global Warming is a scam for Global Government control or not. Yes, you read right, a scam to control the world and to reduce earth’s human population to 1/3 of what it is today; and the living won’t be you or I. Open your minds and dont believe the main stream news just as you are being a reader of TNG. Scan MSM sites yes but scan sites like or to see the other side of the coin too.

  2. Victor says:

    The science of climate change is pretty basic: humans dig up fossilized carbon to fuel power plants and internal combustion machines, releasing CO2 into the atmosphere. Result: greenhouse effect global heating. Around 50% of all the species on the planet are predicted to become extinct by 2100 in the CO2-as-usual model. Our own species will face drought, famine, rising tides, soaring temperatures, calamity and chaos. Hundreds of millions will become climate refugees. Billions may die from starvation, genocide and war. We have precious little time to mitigate this looming global catastrophe.

    Those of us still denying the depressing facts are either tragically stupid or profoundly corrupt or both.

  3. Meme Mine says:

    DISCO SCIENCE says Cooling Causes Warming

    Real environmentalists saw the smoking icebergs of truth from climate-gate as a good thing, those with other agendas didn’t. We the majority now know the climate emergency is called off so you can stop TRYING to scare our children […].

    Be happy! Is that possible?

    Finally this modern day witch burning is over so now we can be civilized environmentalists who “preserve, protect and respect nature” and who face the future energy challenges with courage, not the old fear factor from an old CO2 mistake.
    Get ahead of the curve doomers because promising a dead planet for another 24 years is not sustainable in support from “we” the people, the voters. Voters decide science policy, not paid consultants in lab coats who somehow strangely outnumber climate change protestors by thousands. So how come it wasn’t your scientists marching instead of you […]?

    Al Gore and others will be arrested for leading the planet to an enviro-WMD war against itself, a non-existent enemy. So don’t look like the last fella to show up at the party with disco duds on.

    This cultural and scientific and political mistake was a growing pain and it’s about time this advanced society grew up.

    Remember, environmentalism caused [global] warming.

Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found




  • The Nut Graph


Switch to our mobile site