• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Perak case must be heard by High Court first (Updated 8:01pm)

By Bernama

March 23, 2009

(Updated 8:01pm, 23 March 2009)

PUTRAJAYA, 23 March 2009: The Federal Court here today ruled that issues involving the interpretation of Article 16 (6) of the Perak Constitution must be heard and decided at the High Court and can only be brought to the Federal Court by way of appeal.

The five-member bench presided by Court of Appeal President Tan Sri Alauddin Mohd Sheriff made the decision after allowing a preliminary objection by Datuk Seri Mohammad Nizar Jamaluddin’s lead counsel, Sulaiman Abdullah, that the Federal Court was not seised of jurisdiction to hear the four questions to be referred to it for determination.

The court was to have heard today the four questions in Mohammad Nizar’s suit challenging the legitimacy of Datuk Zambry Abdul Kadir’s appointment as Perak menteri besar.

Both Mohammad Nizar and Zambry were present.

In the unanimous decision, Justice Alauddin said the High Court judge had no power to make the order for the four questions to be referred to the Federal Court under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA) because that section was confined to the Federal Constitution and not the state constitution.

He then set aside all the orders made by the Court of Appeal on 20 March including that which ruled that the four questions must be heard and decided by the Federal Court and remitted the case to the Kuala Lumpur High Court, before the same judge, Lau Bee Lan.

On 10 March, Justice Lau pronounced four constitutional questions to be determined by the Federal Court.

Mohammad Nizar, 52, who is also Perak PAS deputy commissioner, had filed for a judicial review seeking to declare that he is the rightful menteri besar of Perak and an injunction to bar Zambry from discharging his duties as the menteri besar.

When met after the decision, he said he was thankful and that the decision was a beginning on the road to justice in the country’s judicial system.

Asked whether he expected to win today, he said: “I thought it was only 50-50”.

On his request for an audience with the Sultan of Perak to present three motions, including one calling for the dissolution of the assembly, which were approved by the state assembly at its sitting under a tree in Ipoh recently, he said the relevant documents were submitted to the sultan 10 days ago.

However, he had yet to receive a response.

At the outset of proceedings, Alauddin rejected Sulaiman’s application to have the case heard before a nine-member bench, saying that a five-member bench was sufficient.

He also allowed the prosecution’s application for Attorney-General Tan Sri Abdul Gani Patail to be an intervener in the hearing on the preliminary objection.

Sulaiman, in his submission, said that under Section 84 of the Courts of Judicature Act (CJA), the Federal Court was seised of jurisdiction to hear the four questions because the section was only applicable to questions of law regarding the Federal Constitution and not the state constitution and there was no law which gave Lau the power to move the issue to the higher court.

“The court is not at liberty to stretch or pervert the laws on the constitution to suit its purpose. In fact, my client (Mohammad Nizar) did not wish his case to be referred to the Federal Court,” he said, adding that despite the urgency of the issue, no shortcut was allowed but the rule of law must be followed.

Abdul Gani submitted that Article 63 of the laws of the Constitution of Perak and Section 84 of the CJA were consistent with each other and both provisions were formulated by the legislature to allow reference of constitutional questions to the Federal Court.

He said all the constitutional questions referred to the Federal Court were relevant to the issue raised by Mohammad Nizar for a judicial review. — Bernama

 

Share this:

  • Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)
  • Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)
  • Click to email a link to a friend (Opens in new window)

Related Stories

Filed Under: News Tagged With: cases, court, Federal Court, high court, Perak

Primary Sidebar

Search

Twitter

My Tweets

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2023 The Nut Graph