• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Mukhriz’s proposal unlawful: MCA

By Deborah Loh

December 3, 2008

KUALA LUMPUR, 3 Dec 2008: MCA has thrown the law books against Datuk Mukhriz Mahathir for his suggestion to close vernacular schools as a way to forge national unity.

The party’s legal bureau chairperson Datuk Leong Tang Chong in a statement said Mukhriz’s proposal had violated Article 152(1) of the Federal Constitution which states that “no person should be prohibited or prevented from using (otherwise than for official purposes), or from teaching or learning, any other language”.

Clause (b) of the same article also states that “nothing in this Clause shall prejudice the right of the Federal Government or of any State Government to preserve and sustain the use and study of the language of any other community in the Federation”.

Leong said the idea of abolishing the vernacular school system by integrating it into the national school system amounted to sedition as defined in Section 3 of Sedition Act 1948 (revised 1969), whereby a ‘seditious tendency’ involves the questioning of any matter, right, status, provision, privilege, sovereignty or prerogative that is established or protected by the Constitution.

“MCA condemns such irresponsible statements and calls for an immediate end to such political posturing,” Leong said.

“Mukhriz should make a public apology to all Malaysians and refrain from such political rhetoric. The law is clear and no one is above the law. The supremacy of the Federal Constitution must be defended at all times and respected by all Malaysians.”

Leong also highlighted past court cases involving calls to abolish vernacular schools.

He cited the 1971 case of Melan Abdullah and Anor vs PP, in which Bahasa Malaysia daily Utusan Melayu on 6 April 1971 published an editorial titled “Hapuskan sekolah beraliran Tamil atau Cina“. The court ruled that the heading was a clear violation of Article 152.

In another case, PP vs Mark Koding in 1982, Leong noted that Koding, a member of parliament, was found guilty of making seditious remarks in his speech in the Dewan Rakyat on 11 Oct 1978, where he questioned the government’s policy on allowing vernacular schools. The MP also questioned the use of Chinese and Tamil on road signboards, and even suggested that the Constitution be amended to restrict the use of other languages.

“Now, Mukhriz has also made a suggestion to abolish Chinese and vernacular schools in the lobby of Parliament.  In light of the above [legal] authorities, is his statement not seditious?” said Leong.

Leong added that Mukhriz’s reply that his statement was meant to enhance national unity was “no excuse”.

Mukhriz, the Umno Youth chief aspirant, had said in his defence that his idea was meant as a solution to bring about “real unity”. TNG

See also: Mukhriz’s proposal is unconstitutional

Filed Under: News Tagged With: Mukhriz, sedition, vernacular schools

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2025 The Nut Graph