• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About
  • Contact
  • RSS
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
The Nut Graph

The Nut Graph

Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture

  • Projects
    • MP Watch
    • Found in Conversation
  • Current Issues
    • 6 Words
    • Commentary
    • Features
    • Found in Quotation
    • News
  • Columns
  • Interviews
    • Exclusives
    • Found in Malaysia
  • Multimedia
    • Audio
    • Pictures
    • Videos
  • Corrections
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Vault
    • Found in Translation

Appeal Court allows Sivanesan’s testimony in Teoh inquest

October 28, 2009

PUTRAJAYA, 28 Oct 2009: The Court of Appeal here today ruled that the evidence of a witness, T Sivanesan, who alleged that he was abused and tortured by a group of Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) officers, was relevant in determining the cause of Teoh Beng Hock‘s death.

Justice Datuk Suriyadi Halim Omar, who sat with justices Datuk Hasan Lah and Datuk Ahmad Maarop, held that there was a connection between Sivanesan’s testimony and the political aide’s death as the two incidents involved the same government agency at the same building.

“We can see the connection, and there is a propensity that the MACC may be involved, whether you like it or not, the incidents happened at the same building, involving the same entity, so isn’t there a connection?

“The purpose of the inquest is to find the deceased’s cause of death. To the coroner, he must investigate what is the cause of death. Give him a chance (to do so),” Suriyadi said in dismissing the appeal by the MACC against the High Court’s decision not to expunge Sivanesan’s testimony.

Teoh, 30, a political aide to Selangor state executive councillor Ean Yong Hian Wah, was found dead on 16 July 2009 on the fifth floor corridor of Plaza Masalam, Shah Alam, where the MACC office is located. He was at the MACC to give a statement as a witness over allegations of misuse of funds by Selangor state executive councillors.

During the inquest on 9 Sept 2009, Coroner Azmil Muntapha Abas ruled that the police report lodged by Sivanesan dated 11 Sept 2008, alleging that he was abused and tortured by MACC officers, was relevant to assist the inquest in determining the cause of Teoh’s death.

He then allowed Sivanesan to testify and accepted the police report together with a set of photographs of the alleged injuries which were tendered in court.

Sivanesan, 23, an assistant manager with Kuantan-based Puncak Rezeki Makmur Sdn Bhd, had testified that he was punched all over the body while his genitals were “whipped” with an iron rod wrapped in newspapers by an MACC officer known as Ashraf.

Dissatisfied with the coroner’s ruling, the MACC, represented by counsel Datuk Abdul Razak Musa, filed for a revision by the High Court but it was dismissed on 10 Sept by Judicial Commissioner Datin Yeoh Wee Siam. Yeoh held that there was nothing illegal, incorrect or improper in the coroner allowing Sivanesan to testify at the inquest.

Deputy public prosecutor Manoj Kurup, for the MACC, in the second attempt to set aside Sivanesan’s evidence today, contended that the purpose of Sivanesan’s testimony was merely to tarnish the MACC’s image.

He also submitted that the High Court judge had erred in holding that a nexus could exist between what happened to Sivanesan and what might have happened to Teoh.

At this juncture, Suriyadi said: “The idea that the witness’s testimony was to taint the MACC’s image is just your speculation, assessment and opinion. You have to show us if there was an illegality in the procedure or process of making the decision. Was there any error in the process?”

Manoj replied: “The whole process was correct. It is just the decision (that we are challenging).”

“In an inquest, the rules will not be followed strictly. We must have an open mind to find the cause of death. The death occurred at your (MACC) building. The other side is trying to show that there is propensity of MACC involvement,” Suriyadi said.

The court then dismissed the appeal without hearing from counsel Gobind Singh Deo, for Teoh’s family.

Also appearing with Manoj was counsel Datuk Abdul Razak Musa, while counsel Malik Imtiaz Sarwar acted for the Selangor government. — Bernama

Filed Under: News

Primary Sidebar

Search

Recent Comments

  • Wave33 on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Adam on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • PSTan on The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Andre Lai on The Nut Graph stops publication

Recent News

  • The Nut Graph stops publication
  • Nasihat tentang sepupu yang mengganggu perasaan
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: The Sunni-Shia split and the answer to Muslim unity
  • Why Malaysia needs the national unity bills
  • Challenging government in the digital age: Lessons from Kidex
  • Najib’s failure
  • Babi, anjing, pondan: Jijik orang Islam Malaysia
  • Kidex and the law – What the government’s not telling you
  • Beyond Dyana Sofya
  • Uncommon Sense with Wong Chin Huat: Does Malaysia need hate speech laws?

Tags

Abdullah Ahmad Badawi Anwar Ibrahim Barisan Nasional BN Bukit Selambau by-election dap Deborah Loh Ding Jo-Ann Election Commission elections Found in Malaysia Found in Quotation Gan Pei Ling government high court Hishammuddin Hussein ISA islam Jacqueline Ann Surin Khairy Jamaluddin KW Mak Lim Guan Eng Malaysia MCA Menteri Besar MP Watch Muhyiddin Yassin muslim Najib Razak Pakatan Rakyat Parliament Parti Keadilan Rakyat pas Penang Perak PKR police politics prime minister Selangor Shanon Shah Umno Wong Chin Huat Zedeck Siew

Footer

  • About The Nut Graph
  • Who Are We?
  • Our Contributors
  • Past Contributors
  • Guest Contributors
  • Editorial Policy
  • Comments & Columns
  • Copyright Policy
  • Web Accessibility Policy
  • Privacy Policy
The Nut Graph

© 2025 The Nut Graph