Categorised | Found in Malaysia

“We were not raised to see differences”

Imtiaz, wearing black

HUMAN rights lawyer and activist Malik Imtiaz Sarwar recently won the Bindmans Law and Campaigning award for his work on human rights.

Malik, who says he always knew he wanted to be a lawyer, has worked on some precedent-setting cases, including the Apcet 2 remand hearing, and the Lina Joy conversion case that earned him death threats.

Malik posing with his award

Imtiaz poses with his Bindmans award

The current president of the National Human Rights Society (Hakam) talked to The Nut Graph on 11 May 2009 at his office in Kuala Lumpur about an idyllic life growing up in Penang, and the impact of 22 years of Mahathirism.

TNG: Where were you born, and where did you grow up?

Imtiaz: I was born in Penang, on 29 January 1970, at the Adventist Hospital. I spent my primary and secondary schooling years there — at Wellesley Primary School and at Seri Inai, which had just been set up then. A lot of the academics from USM (Universiti Sains Malaysia) sent their children to the school. One of my school mates was Azmi Sharom. His younger brother, Azlan, was my classmate. Karpal Singh’s kids all went to Seri Inai as well.

I left at 16 to do my A-levels in Singapore. I went to Raffles Junior College — I was an Asean scholar.

What was growing up in Penang like?

It’s what we all fantasise about what Malaysia can be. Growing up in Penang was a very gentle, nurturing sort of existence. Maybe because my dad was an academic and we were thrown together with all sorts of people. And there was never any distinction between who or what we were. Everyone just trusted each other to do the right thing.

We had Hindu friends — very close family friends — and we used to spend a lot of time in their house. And their parents just instinctively understood that they had to be careful when it came to food where we were concerned. Likewise with my family, when people came over for festivals, there would always be vegetarian food.

So there was a lot of respect for each other’s differences. And I think there was also a lot of acceptance of each other’s differences as well. Life there was very rich; we had the benefit of a full multiracial existence without really thinking about it.

Malik as a child

Imtiaz (right), five years old, as the entrance to the East West Center where his father was doing his PhD (pic courtesy of Imtiaz)

But as I grew up, things slowly changed. I was in secondary school when Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad came to power and bumiputera-isms became very marked. There was talk about who could get a scholarship and who couldn’t. This obsession with wanting a “bin” in your name. All that sort of language started entering our sphere of consciousness. That became very difficult to understand for many of us. We were not raised to see differences.

We were made to understand that if you are a Malay [Malaysian], then you are a bumiputera. But then Indian Muslims in Penang were considered bumiputera, and they came from the southern part of India, whereas we were from the northern part, but were not considered bumiputera.

Tell me about your family.

Mother in bridal wear

Imtiaz's mother on her wedding day (pic courtesy of Imtiaz)

My dad, Datuk Prof Gulam Sarwar, 70, is an academic. He set up the humanities school in USM. He is now an adjunct professor at Universiti Malaya (UM) on theatre studies. My mom is Hajrah, and I have one sibling, an older brother, who is a doctor.

Were your parents originally from Penang?

No, actually, my parents were originally from Perak. Dad’s from Taiping and mom’s from Kuala Kangsar.

How did they end up in Penang?

Imtiaz's maternal great grandmother (pic courtesy of Imtiaz)

They were already there by the mid-60s. My dad graduated from UM with a degree in literature — he’s quite well written about actually. He got a posting at Methodist Boys’ School in Penang before going on to join USM after feeling a calling to do research in Malay traditional theatre and art forms from 1969 or 1970.

He is known mainly for wayang kulit and Mak Yong. He helped get Mak Yong declared as a world heritage art form. He was instrumental in getting the proposal through to Unesco. I guess that’s how my parents ended up in Penang, and they stayed on because they liked it.

We are all pendatangs. Where did your family originally come from?

On my father’s side, my grandfather was a migrant. He came in from that part of India that later became Pakistan. He came when he was still a young man — maybe in his teens — well before World War II. He was an entrepreneur. But I am not sure of the exact dates when he came to Malaya.


I am also not sure when my ancestors on my mother’s side came here. But they, too, were from the same part of India that became Pakistan. Both sides have been here for a long time.

My great grandmother, when she was alive—  she died quite late, in her late 90s a few years ago — she could remember the horrors of Partition. I am not sure if she was told the stories or she was there, but I remember her telling us the stories.

Tell me more about your grandparents.

My grandfather’s name was Mohammed Yusof, and he settled in Perak. He worked in textiles first, before diversifying. He built himself up financially before going back home to get a wife. They had five children in all.

On my mother’s side, there were seven children in all — three girls and four boys. Both my parents were the eldest in their respective families. My dad was one of two boys, but his younger brother died quite early.

My mother’s siblings have all gone on to do well. One of them is Abdul Majid Nabi Baksh, the academic and author. He was professor of English at UM at one stage.  Another brother was with the Attorney-General’s chambers, but left soon after Operation Lalang.  Another one was deputy dean of engineering at UKM (Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia); I also have an uncle who is retired now but is consulting with the education ministry. You could say my mom’s side were all from a very academic background.

After doing your A-levels in Singapore, what did you do?

I couldn’t get to do law at National University of Singapore, so I came back and did law here. There was a problem over whether or not I qualified for a scholarship, but apparently, I did not, at that point.

Formal pic of his parents

Imtiaz's parents (pic courtesy of Imtiaz)

How come?

I think there was a lot of confusion over what is a bumiputera and what is not. When I went for the Asean scholarship interview, I was asked why I didn’t stay back in Malaysia, where I could possibly benefit from being a bumiputera. So that’s when I told them that I was not — at that point. But now I have been invited to join the Bumiputera Entrepreneur Chamber and all that.

But I think no one really understands where this line is drawn. Recently, in an interview with Al Jazeera, Tun (Dr) Mahathir (Mohamad) was asked pointedly how he could consider himself to be a Malay when he had Indian ancestry, and he replied that the constitution is the constitution. By that definition, I could also be considered Malay.

When I was in Singapore, I had a chance to speak with the other Asean scholars — there were about 100 of us. And these were the top one percent of the students in the country, from various backgrounds. And when I asked them why they were there, the answer was uniform: “We couldn’t get scholarships to study overseas, and the Singapore government offered us a place.”

Of this number, I think one or two were eventually offered Public Service Department (PSD) scholarships and came back to Malaysia. But most of the rest stayed on in Singapore after completing their studies, and some eventually gave up their citizenships. I don’t blame them — they went on to do something with their lives, with really great jobs. So the Asean scholarship was a lifeline for them and that, for me, was an eye-opener, you know. It was a real awakening.

Were you ever tempted to move overseas?

My father, in his career, suffered from the fact that he was not a bumi. He was passed over for promotion numerous times, even though he was internationally reputed in his field. And some of his colleagues went on to make a name for themselves overseas, too. But he stayed back because he really believed in what he was doing.

Brother Malik Mumtaz, and four years old Imtiaz, in Hawaii while their dad does his PhD (pic courtesy of Imtiaz)

I guess from him I got this sense of … you’ve got to be prepared to stand up for what you believe in. That was a lesson that was very firmly entrenched for us when we were growing up. You had to be respectful, you had to be careful, you have to sometimes turn the other cheek, you know, but you never back down on principle if it [is] important to you.

What is the kind of Malaysia you would want to see for future generations?

I wish it could be the way it was before. I wish we could remove the 22 years of Mahathirism and plot it the way it might have gone if Tun Hussein Onn had remained on as prime minister.

I think we have emphasised material gain too much. The emphasis has always been about status and symbolism. Vision 2020 was all about the symbol of developed nation status. We’ve not really given much thought to human infrastructural needs, and the societal evolution that we need.

In many ways, we are a bankrupt society that is so focused on wealth and status — at the cost of all the key ingredients of an informed and well-developed society. It’s not just about racial delineations, it’s about intellectual limitations, it’s about cultural limitations.

Speaking from the floor at the Zaid Ibrahim and Nazri Aziz debate on the Judicial Appointments Commission (Pic by Roger Tan)

The kind of society we have, strictly speaking, should be really one of the model societies in the world. Where else can you find a society that, although we have all been brought together, we have not all melted into each other. We still have our heritage, we still have our culture.

I think in terms of nationalism and national identity, we ultimately have to embrace one national identity, but [our various backgrounds allow us such richness and diversity and it’s] not just the festivals and open houses. It’s about the kind of fabric that could be woven together that in itself then speaks for competitiveness, strength, resilience — all the things that we need to move into the future.

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , ,

13 Responses to ““We were not raised to see differences””

  1. Pratamad says:

    Malaysia is very fortunate to have a thinker like Malik!

    A bankrupt society is what we get from 22 years of Mahathir – I can’t agree more on this! A society that’s so deficit on software and even heartware. A simple case in point: visit any of those so-called “iconic” buildings one or two years after they were built under the Mahathir era, you will either notice a white elephant or see a badly maintained environment, not befitting of its original “artist’s impression”. We can build hardware, but we have no vision or commitment to throw in the software or even our heart to maintain and use it fully.

  2. MXVoon says:

    Thanks Malik Imtiaz (and The Nut Graph) for sharing yourself and your journey with us. It certainly made me reflect on my own journey, perhaps also on my internal yearning for equality and basic human rights. Rights that do not depend on nor segregate differences.

  3. Sivakumar Velayutham says:

    Malik Imtiaz is spot on in his comments which are very thoughtful and measured. I admire him for his persistence without arousing emotions.

  4. What a towering Malaysian, Malik. May almighty God continue to guide you and bless you in this common cause of truth, justice and righteousness and most importantly, that we are all one.

    Keep well, Malik.

  5. Dragon Leo says:

    Most knowledgeable and humble man.You speak for the majority.

  6. Lakshmi G says:

    I’m proud that you are a Malaysian and have stood by your principles as has your great father. And yet, I’m ashamed of what has happened and is still happening in our country . This is the only country we know and despite our sacrifices and hard work, we are called “pendatang” and treated as such.

  7. saidah rastam says:

    Thank you for this great article!

  8. Steven Ong says:

    ”I think we have emphasised material gain too much. The emphasis has always been about status and symbolism. Vision 2020 was all about the symbol of developed nation status. We’ve not really given much thought to human infrastructural needs, and the societal evolution that we need.”

    I agree with his statement wholeheartedly. And I blame it on the greed and lust of the wannabe rich that they were blinded by the power that was, on the humanitarian aspect of society as a whole. It’s time that we undo the snare that was set a longtime ago. If the snare is not removed, how can we move forward? When we are always fighting each other instead of building this nation? It’s a stumbling block to our (all Malaysians’) advancement to be not only a prosperous and rich, but morally and righteously strong, nation.

  9. ai tze says:

    What a reflective and uplifting article. The icing for me – are the comments. It’s wonderful to know that there are other Malaysians out there who feel the same as I do. I sense that many of us feel somewhat aggrieved about being made “to see the differences” and the widening polarisation of the races as a result. The years after Merdeka should have brought us closer but alas the opposite happened. However, I also sense a feeling of hope and optimism in the comments and that all is not lost. At least I hope so.

  10. Balle says:

    I too wish we could erase 22 years of the Mahathir era. I would trade two twin towers and a Putrajaya for a chance to see a truly multiracial country where the people coexist in real harmony. We don’t need 1Malaysia to tell us how we should be.

  11. Ken says:

    Thanks for your sharing Malik. I can identify with what has been written as I believe that I grew up with friends from various cultures and religions. We went to the homes of one another and ate the food offered. We only started becoming aware of this divisive entity called ‘race’ when in secondary school, when those of us who were non-Malays started becoming aware that we were not gonna be treated equally nor given equal opportunities. Therefore, we either worked harder or cut our own path through the forest.

    Ironically, it was in the Teachers’ Teaching College that racism stared at me fully in the face. And after getting a ring-side seat at the place where all future teachers are trained, I had a second helping of how the world wants to pigeon-hole and segregate people when I entered university. It’s really frightening that it’s at these two tertiary institutions that are supposed to develop minds and build racial harmony that gave me my clearest and most distressing experience of the opposite. Is it any wonder why inter-racial relations are at among their lowest ebbs now compared to before? If students are not exposed to positive role models who are able to transcend the colour of skin in schools and universities, how can we expect them not to behave in suspicion and fear at the differences in others?

  12. Kelly Brown says:

    Hi, interesting post. I’ll write you later about a few questions!

  13. GarykPatton says:

    I think I will try to recommend this post to my friends and family, because it’s really helpful.

Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found




  • The Nut Graph


Switch to our mobile site