Categorised | Features

Understanding GST

Malaysia is among the last in the region to impose goods and services tax
(© Sanja Gjenero /

MALAYSIA is among the last in the region to impose goods and services tax (GST) but it still shelved its original implementation in 2007. It was only after spending the last two years in consultation with tax professionals and industry players, that the GST bill was tabled in Parliament on 16 Dec 2009. It will likely be passed next year and come into force in mid-2011 at a rate of 4%.

This time, the sense of urgency is greater: Malaysia cannot continue depending on revenue from its depleting petroleum reserves, and must find sustainable ways of funding development. Called value added tax (VAT) in some countries, the GST is considered an equitable and comprehensive system of taxation that minimises evasion and ensures a broader revenue stream. 

That is, if enforcement and implementation is top-notch. Much lies on the government to educate businesses and consumers about the GST, and to have a solid information technology framework to implement it. At the moment, the government has shed little information on its impact other than promising not to burden the poor. How should laypeople view the GST?

Price concerns

poverty coupon
Will the GST starve the poor? (© Paul Downey / Flickr)

The immediate outcry is that GST will “feed the rich and starve the poor“. There is the view that GST should be accompanied by lower personal and corporate taxes. There are worries that tax imposed at each stage of the supply or manufacturing chain will result in multiple taxation on local industries and consumers at the retail end.

PricewaterhouseCoopers Taxation Services Sdn Bhd executive director Sitartha Raja Kumaran Rasiah notes that the government has promised not to burden the poor with GST by “zero-rating” certain essential services. These include water and electricity for households, says Sitartha. The government also intends to exempt education, medical and public transportation services.

“The government should also give some kind of assurance that it will not raise GST beyond the introductory 4% for some time. This may help people accept it better,” Sitartha tells The Nut Graph in a phone interview.

People should also realise, he adds, that the GST is going to replace the current sales and services tax of 10% and 5% each. Certain goods and services may end up cheaper with GST, depending on whether those items are currently imposed with sales and services tax.

tax forms
The government needs to educate the public well on how tax works (pic of tax forms
public domain / Wiki Commons)

As for fears of multiple taxation, the input tax credit mechanism will allow industries along the supply or production chain to claim credit or get refunds on whatever GST is imposed.”There should be no ‘cascading’ effect of multiple taxation.”

The government should start an extensive education and public awareness drive now to explain how the tax works and its impact on prices, says Sitartha. “They should do a list of the prices of goods and services to compare prices pre- and post-GST.”

GST implementation should also be accompanied by stringent price monitoring, and the government is on the right track with plans to adopt anti-profiteering laws, Sitartha adds.

Protecting the poor

Veerinderjeet Singh
When it comes to exempting “basic essentials” from GST, however, the government must be careful not to have an overly long list for political popularity. Taxand Malaysia Sdn Bhd managing director Dr Veerinderjeet Singh cautions that too many exemptions can nullify the purpose of GST as a broad revenue base.

The additional RM1billion in revenue that the government expects to earn annually from GST after it replaces the sales and services tax is “rather low”, and could be due to the exemptions it plans to give, he suggests.

Ultimately, the list of GST-exempted goods and services may determine how well the poor are shielded. The full and final list has not been announced, but it should be limited to basic necessities for the population’s poorer segment. Luxury items should be taxed in keeping with the GST principle that the higher income group pays more for consuming more.

Veerinderjeet notes that some countries adjust implementation of GST for the lower-income group by applying the tax only to businesses that achieve sales turnovers of a certain threshold and beyond. Or, by raising the taxable income threshold.

Cash off-sets can also be given to the poor in the first year of GST implementation, as done by some countries, he adds.

Government revenue and income tax

Lowering personal and corporate tax in tandem with GST are appealing from a consumer perspective. But doing so as soon as GST is introduced would only drive up the national deficit, which for 2010 is expected to be 5.6% of gross domestic product.

“It’s more realistic to wait after the first one or two years to see how it’s working out. If collection is smooth and revenue is substantial, then there are grounds to lower income tax,” Veerinderjeet says.

Malaysia’s situation is also different from Singapore’s, where GST was introduced as a new tax and not a replacement tax as it is here.

“They had to lower personal and corporate tax to gain public acceptability, whereas we are replacing the sales and services tax,” he adds.

Sitartha (pic courtesy of
Sitartha Raja Kumaran

Because GST here will be a replacement tax, it is not a given that government must lower income tax immediately, says Sitartha. At 4%, it is revenue neutral in that it is merely recovering a little more than the same amount of revenue earned through the sales and services tax.

“The government could raise the GST rate in the future, but it is important to do it slowly and gradually,” Sitartha notes.

Making it work

GST or VAT may not be a perfect system but has worked well as a revenue base for other countries. Malaysia’s problem may lie more in public education, implementation and enforcement.

Sitartha stresses that a clear and thorough explanation of the GST is necessary and urgent. “Australia managed to introduce GST with little inflation because the government had a good communications and education programme, especially for small businesses,” he notes.

It is not just explaining the tax itself but also promoting the use of information technology, which is what will drive the taxation system, adds Veerinderjeet.

Efficient electronic filing is important
Electronic filing is key to ensuring speedy GST registration and refunds for those who qualify for input tax credits. This is very crucial for importers and supply-chain producers.”

Poor registration and enforcement have hampered revenue collection even now, under the present sales and services tax regime, he notes. Some businesses escape remitting taxes yet still charge consumers.

A massive framework for e-filing and enforcement needs to be set up, and is why the government needs 18 months from the passing of the bill in 2010 before the GST can be enforced.

Milking it?

The government will be releasing more information soon on the GST, Finance Minister II Datuk Ahmad Husni Mohamad Hanadzlah tells The Nut Graph when asked for an interview on the tax.

But Pakatan Rakyat has started an anti-GST task force and is likely to make it an electoral issue. Sentiment is that Malaysia is ranked more corrupt than ever and people are cynical that imposing GST will only be another avenue for corruption.

Introducing taxes of any sort is hardly populist, yet the budget deficit and depleting natural resources leave the federal government with little choice. Still, if it wants to convince the public, it must answer tough questions about GST vis-à-vis other means of raising revenue, the huge profits of concession companies, and combating corruption.

The Nut Graph needs your support

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

3 Responses to “Understanding GST”

  1. malaysiaboleh says:

    “People should also realise, he adds, that the GST is going to replace the current sales and services tax of 10% and 5% each. Certain goods and services may end up cheaper with GST, depending on whether those items are currently imposed with sales and services tax”

    As a retailer, I found it hard to believe that goods or services would be cheaper. Although mathematically it is so on paper, but practice wise, it never happened. Case in hand, the price of many items went up during the short ‘oil panic period’. When the oil price went bust, the retail price remained the same. Wholesalers never reduced the price back. Unless it was for controlled items even if some goods and services’ cost went down with the oil price bust, retail pricing remains the same. More profit what?

    Now, wonder how the [government] wants to control the price via Anti-Profiteering Law. Maybe all items would be on the control list. I don’t think so lah, see lah how it goes.

    Your article is spot on in highlighting the need for impeccable and ultra effective monitoring and enforcement. If not, the GST would just go to the pockets of unsavoury retail characters.

    Anyhow, reckon we cannot run away from GST/VAT. Lets’ pray that the rollout is efficient and [the government’s] coffers are fuller by the end of 2011. Heck, we need good money to sue someone in Latin America to get back our jet engine. Hope the GST will provide for it and pray hard that the MACC boys will never never ever have to participate in a royal inquiry to check the mismanagement of GST in years to come.

  2. MyMalaya says:

    The introduction of this GST system must be in tandem with increased government effort to combat corruption. That way people will have more confidence in the government knowing their money will not necessarily go into someone else’s pockets.

    PKFZ is a great place to start. But mind you make sure if there is ever one big fish involved in the fiasco, make them accountable.

  3. kiat says:

    Ms Loh has written an informative and balanced article on GST. Will GST be another avenue for corruption? I don’t know but I’m sure the form of corruption will be different. In sales and services tax, the buyer can stipulate that the seller takes care of the taxes in a contract, which you can’t do in GST. Now if it is a big contract, 10% difference in price would either get a seller short-listed or be thrown out. Sellers have strong incentive to cheat, one way is to corrupt an enforcer. In GST, a buyer can’t run away from paying GST if he needs to show a clean account. In GST, a seller has one less avenue to hide his cost and must rely on other means to compete. Would he pocket the GST for himself to offset his selling price? If he does and gets caught, will he be able to bribe his way out? How would an honest business man view GST? Will he like it more compared to the sales and service tax?

Most Read in Features

Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found




  • The Nut Graph


Switch to our mobile site