Comments on: Kugan was beaten, says second post-mortem (Updated 7.05pm) http://www.thenutgraph.com/kugan-beaten-say-second-post-mortem/ Making Sense of Politics & Pop Culture Mon, 30 Jan 2012 19:50:18 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 By: simon khoo http://www.thenutgraph.com/kugan-beaten-say-second-post-mortem/#comment-2881 simon khoo Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:40:44 +0000 #comment-2881 The pathologist who signed off on the first post-mortem should be charged for covering up evidence along with the murderous police. Let's call a spade is a spade. I suggest Amnesty International Malaysia should take this case up to the international arena. (This is not an isolated incident.) The rakyat can expect even worse brutality from the thugs in uniforms when Najib becomes PM. God have mercy on the rakyat, save us from harm. The pathologist who signed off on the first post-mortem should be charged for covering up evidence along with the murderous police. Let’s call a spade is a spade.

I suggest Amnesty International Malaysia should take this case up to the international arena. (This is not an isolated incident.) The rakyat can expect even worse brutality from the thugs in uniforms when Najib becomes PM.

God have mercy on the rakyat, save us from harm.

]]> By: Hafidz Baharom http://www.thenutgraph.com/kugan-beaten-say-second-post-mortem/#comment-2871 Hafidz Baharom Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:35:55 +0000 #comment-2871 I knew it! It wasn't air jampi that he drank, that's for sure. I knew it! It wasn’t air jampi that he drank, that’s for sure.

]]> By: Tony http://www.thenutgraph.com/kugan-beaten-say-second-post-mortem/#comment-2870 Tony Tue, 03 Mar 2009 13:02:47 +0000 #comment-2870 Police in action particular targeting our Indian brothers Police in action particular targeting our Indian brothers

]]> By: Ken D http://www.thenutgraph.com/kugan-beaten-say-second-post-mortem/#comment-2868 Ken D Tue, 03 Mar 2009 11:55:20 +0000 #comment-2868 My question is: will the pathologist who signed off on the first post mortem be charged for covering up evidence? At the very least, he or she should be charged for incompetence. How can the results of two post mortems vary so much? Disturbing and disgusting. My question is: will the pathologist who signed off on the first post mortem be charged for covering up evidence? At the very least, he or she should be charged for incompetence. How can the results of two post mortems vary so much? Disturbing and disgusting.

]]>