Categorised | Letters to the Editor

Inquests are hamstrung

PAKATAN Rakyat views as mockery the cabinet’s decision to limit the terms of reference of the Royal Commission of Inquiry to only investigate the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC)’s investigative procedures, and to have an inquest determine Teoh Beng Hock’s death.

MACC’s unjustifiable conduct in their investigations is clearly connected to Teoh’s death, and the actual facts of what really happened need to be uncovered.

Many troubling questions need to be answered:

    Why are other complaints of corruption, involving much larger sums, and Barisan Nasional leaders not investigated? Who directed the MACC to start the witch hunt against the Selangor state assemblypersons?
    Why was Teoh’s case, allegedly involving an amount less than RM2,500, pursued with such aggression and urgency?
    Why was Teoh and another so-called “witness” kept overnight and interrogated with such oppression?
    Why the delay in informing concerned parties of Teoh’s death?
    Why was Teoh’s handphone in the MACC’s custody when the MACC insisted that he was only a witness? Why did the MACC initially deny they took his handphone?
    Why was Teoh’s lawyer not allowed to see or accompany him during interrogation?
    Why would Teoh spend the night at the MACC’s office if he was free to go especially since he was scheduled to be married the next morning?
    Why would Teoh commit suicide, as [suggested] by MACC and others, in these circumstances: he was about to get married, with his fiancé expecting their child, and with no sign or history of depression or mental illness?

Hence, whilst it is appropriate that the royal commission investigate the MACC’s investigation procedures, the key question of how Teoh died must also be investigated and answered by [the commission]. That question cannot be separated from the more general issue of how the MACC conducts investigations.

Inquests ineffective

There is really no need whatsoever for this inquest to proceed, bearing in mind that the royal commission should investigate the circumstances of the death. In any event, we have serious doubts about the effectiveness of such an inquest.

Inquests are conducted by a magistrate who acts as a coroner and is assisted by the deputy public prosecutor (DPP), who will in turn depend on police investigations into the cause of death. In the numerous inquests held on suspicious deaths in custody over the last several years, for example on Tharma Rajen, Ragupathy Muniandy, Ahmad Salleh, Ulaganathan Muniandy, Francis Udayappan and Vivashannu Pillai, proceedings have been hampered by the lack of willingness of the magistrates, the DPPs and the police to fully and seriously investigate the deaths.

As a result, no police officials have been found culpable and most deaths were classified as “natural causes” or “sudden deaths”.

Our experience of these and other inquests show that the inadequacy of the process is also largely due to the fact that the magistrates are restricted to the evidence produced by the police investigating the deaths. In Teoh’s case as well, there is a high level of scepticism about the effectiveness and independence of the police investigation to identify the real cause of his death.

The inquest process is also limited by the fact that magistrates are junior judicial officers still attached to the Judicial and Legal Services whose personnel are frequently transferred between the judicial and prosecution departments — something obviously undesirable for its appearance of bias. This is made worse when the DPP appearing is likely to be a senior prosecutor while the magistrate remains a junior officer.

Inquest proceedings are further hampered by the strict application of criminal and evidentiary rules; the limited findings that can be made without making further recommendations; and the restricted participation of lawyers acting for interested parties.

In the light of the low public confidence commanded by the judiciary, the prosecutors and the police, especially in such a politically explosive case, Pakatan Rakyat demands that the royal commission’s terms of reference be extended to cover all the surrounding circumstances of Teoh’s death. If not, the most important question of how his death occurred would not be answered to the public’s satisfaction.

Needless to say, the royal commission of inquiry should comprise individuals who are competent, independent, credible and of high integrity, and who are able to act without fear or favour in fulfilling its terms of reference.

Sivarasa Rasiah,
PKR vice-president

Dr Dzulkefly Ahmad,
PAS central committee member

Lau Weng San,
Selangor DAP secretary

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

5 Responses to “Inquests are hamstrung”

  1. Sam says:

    Teoh’s family and all witnesses must boycott both the RCI and the inquest. Let them jail all of the witnesses for contempt. This RCI and inquest are to fool gullible [...] folks and [are] a [...] waste of time and resources.

  2. Nicholas Aw says:

    Troubling questions that are well-formulated but [the BN government] would not even bat an eyelid [over these]. Whatever action that is to be taken by the authorities is just an eyewash to satisfy the public’s hunger pangs.

    Looking back at the last 50 years of BN rule, I am of the opinion that the authorities such as the MACC and the police have lost their bearings as law enforcement agencies. In truth, they have become nothing more than the watchdogs of the BN government. If both these agencies want to get back the people’s trust, they have not only got to be transparent but they have to be seen to be transparent, too.

    I believe that the action of the police in particular, has in a way contributed to the rising crime rate in the country. Why is this so? Well, it’s simply because criminals know that the police are too busy with non-policing work to bother with them. In the 70s and 80s, it was common to see police on beat duty. But this is no longer visible. The only time we see police on the ground would be whenever a police programme or project is announced with much fanfare. I remember some time ago when police officers with the rank of inspector and above would cover the ground with the constables. Do you see them now? Of course not! Why? Because they are too busy arresting peaceful people at candlelight vigils and putting a stop to so-called illegal gatherings.

    We appeal to all enforcement agencies, be it the MACC, the police, the Road Transport Department: Go do your work but adhere to SOPs. There are bigger corrupt politicians to catch. There are too many crimes to solve and on the road there are too many very darkly-tinted cars to be compounded.

  3. joon1608 says:

    If our PM does not explain with a good reason why he thinks an inquest is good enough, then all Malaysians will think that he has a part in what happenned. We will be suspicious just like what happenned before. Restore our faith in you, Mr PM!

  4. raguel says:

    Too many suspicious deaths must investigate thoroughly. We want truths however ugly — who [and] what caused a promising young man’s death or we will not have an iota of confidence in the powers that be. [Are] our lives as cheap as ants’?

  5. hypocrite says:

    A person comes into this world with a reason, and that same person will not die without a reason… it takes two to tango….


Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found

Advertisement


<

Advertisement


  • The Nut Graph

 

Switch to our mobile site