Categorised | Columns

Branches laid bare

Branches laid bareThe pruned angsana trees in Bangsar
(Pic by KW Mak)
WHEN the more-than-20-year-old angsana trees along Lorong Ara Kiri 2 in Bangsar were pruned bare in early June 2008, many were alarmed. It didn’t take long before a group of concerned and upset residents confronted the workers from Kuala Lumpur City Hall (DBKL) to stop the cutting.

Residents called up City Hall to protest, only to be told that the pruning was done upon the request of Happy Garden residents association chairperson Ahmad Nordeen to reduce the number of pesky crows in the area.

Residents were furious — firstly, because tree cutting is not a known or reliable method for reducing the crow population; and secondly, because only one residents association chairperson had instructed DBKL to cut the trees. The other three residents associations had not given their consent.

For two weeks, there was a standoff between the residents and DBKL. The City Hall workers insisted that the only person who could call off the tree cutting was the residents association chairperson. Even calls to the area’s Member of Parliament (MP), Nurul Izzah Anwar, led to nothing.

At wit’s end, the residents resorted to calling the office of former Lembah Pantai MP Datuk Seri Shahrizat Abdul Jalil. The tree cutting stopped immediately.

The incident raises questions for us as citizens.

Some wondered whether this was a tactic to smear the reputation of a Pakatan Rakyat MP, and that the whole scenario was orchestrated to show that Barisan Nasional (BN) politicians were still in control.

Others asked why their elected representative could not stop the tree cutting pending an investigation into the propriety of the exercise.

What is clear is that the public have no recourse when City Hall does something they disagree with — unless they resort to exercising a relationship of patronage with whoever is able to call the shots.

This incident only reinforces the need for local governments to have elected representatives who are more likely to represent the people’s interests.

Power to ignore

Local government elections were suspended in March 1965, with the federal government using the Confrontation with Indonesia as an excuse. In 1970, a royal commission report known as the Athinahappan Report called for local government elections to be reinstated; but the suspension of elections was instead made permanent under the Local Government Act 1976.

Branches laid bare(Pic by KW Mak) There is the argument that the City Hall Advisory Board, which is provided for in the Federal Capital Act 1960, actually represents the public’s interest. Board members are assigned various portfolios and sit in on meetings related to their portfolios, such as traffic or licensing, to give their views.

Upon closer examination of the law, however, the board’s powers are limited to giving advice. Section 10 of the Federal Capital Act states that the datuk bandar (mayor) has the power to ignore and act in opposition to the board’s advice after consultation with the federal territories minister, subject to the reasons for his or her actions being minuted.

At the same time, although the law states that the King must approve the appointment of board members, there are no clear guidelines for this process. Previously, membership was restricted to BN component parties according to a quota. This is set to change with mounting public pressure, though how much change remains to be seen.

In the meantime, what all the elected MPs of Kuala Lumpur can do to influence City Hall’s decision-making is to call for press conferences to highlight the people’s ire over an issue (with the high probability that DBKL would respond with “we will look into it.”).

This basically means that an MP in a federal territory is actually made powerless by law to resolve local residents’ issues involving City Hall.

For residents living outside the federal territories, the advisory board is substituted with councillors, as provided for under the Local Government Act 1976.

Councillors have much more clout compared with their DBKL counterparts because councillors have the power to endorse by-laws, projects within the municipality, and the council’s budget.

Hence, the local authority cannot simply ignore councillors should the public complain to them.

Serious conflict of interest

Still, the appointment of councillors is neither clear nor transparent, which leaves the process open to abuse.

In the past, councillors appointed to the Petaling Jaya local authority were BN political appointees, with many of them doubling as property developers in a serious conflict of interest. Under the Pakatan Rakyat, there are still political appointees, but there are some provisions for non-governmental organisations.

Local government elections should be reintroduced, or a clearly defined and transparent system drawn up, to ensure that any appointment of councillors is open to public scrutiny. Such a system should be implemented for all local governments.

Both suggestions can be implemented if there is political will. Elections can be held by amending the Local Government Act and reinstating the suspended Local Government Elections Act 1960 in Parliament, while clear criteria for appointments can be set and implemented by the state executive councils.

These suggestions are not the answer to everything, but they would be a step in the right direction. End of Article

Branches laid bare
(© Dan Shirley /

KW Mak is a DAP-appointed councillor in the Petaling Jaya City Council (MBPJ) who wishes he knew how he got the job, since the appointments are made in closed-door meetings.

Post to Twitter Post to Google Buzz Post to Delicious Post to Digg Post to Facebook Post to StumbleUpon

4 Responses to “Branches laid bare”

  1. myop101 says:

    Yes, while we are at it, we also need to elect our Senators for the Dewan Negara to be given real legislative powers to stop any bills deemed ill-conceived from being passed. It is obvious that with our current system, ill-conceived laws are being passed at the whim of the majority of the MPs of the Dewan Rakyat.

  2. chebella says:


    The trees are in Lucky Garden and not Happy Garden.

    After the spate of tree-cutting dozens of residents have applied to join the residents association (RA).

    To date none of the applications have been approved.

    Meanwhile, the RA last month held their AGM and voted themselves in again.

    Ahmad Nordeen is the president again.

    The AGM was attended by less than 20 members.

    The RA constitution state that a minimum quorum of 30 is required for an AGM.

    The Lucky Garden RA does not represent the residents here and the committee members are not legally appointed.

    The Lucky Garden RA is not respected or trusted by the majority of residents here.

  3. carolynjlau says:

    A small correction – the Residents Association mentioned in Bangsar is Lucky Garden and not Happy Garden! (Which is off Old Klang Road.)

    Elected representatives to better represent the people’s needs are needed not just in local government but in residents associations as well – see my letter to my RA president En Ahmad Nordeen below:

    11th September 2008

    En Ahmad Nordeen
    Persatuan Penduduk-Penduduk Taman Lucky,

    Dear En Ahmad,

    Application for Membership of Taman Lucky Residents Association (TLRA)

    I write to formally enquire the status of my application to join the residents association, as well as the status of 9 other applications by my neighbours, made in June this year.

    My phone enquiry of the same to both you and the Secretary in August, remains unanswered as neither of you have yet to reply to me on this matter.

    I understand that an AGM was held in July this year (see Note 1). During that meeting it was agreed by those in attendance not to decide on our/new membership applications.

    I also understand that there were only between 8 to 12 members present at that AGM and it was agreed on by the majority in attendance to maintain, without voting, positions of office bearers for another term (see Note 2).

    Our intention to join as members is partly to dispel your notion that Taman Lucky consists of apathetic residents. We are interested in the development of our neighbourhood, in helping to strengthen neighbourliness as well as improving the image of Taman Lucky. We feel we can contribute positively to the Residents Association.

    Our membership (or any other additional membership) would assist the TLRA in achieving healthier quorums at meetings, at the very least ensuring the TLRA’s validity as a residents association and not just an exclusive club, as perceived by numerous neighbors.

    Should you still not wish to allow us, or at least me, membership, we/I would appreciate a reply and return of our/my membership fees.


    Carolyn Lau

    cc. Hon Secretary, Taman Lucky residents Association,
    Pn Nurul Izzah, Wakil Rakyat Lembah Pantai,
    Tempinis Neighbours who applied for membership in June 2008.

    Note 1 - Point 13 of the Persatuan Penduduk-penduduk Taman Lucky (1983) constitution states that AGMs are to be held no later than 31st March every year.
    Note 2 - Point 15 of said constitution states that quorum shall be met with at least one half of the total membership or 30 members, whichever is lesser.

  4. KW Mak says:

    Whoops, I stand corrected!

    As for the residents association, I think this is a matter that the community needs to address on its own. In Petaling Jaya, the associations are all registered with MBPJ and we have the public relations department and a Local Agenda 21 office who jointly organise activities with these associations.

    One of those activities was the recently held 2009 Budget briefing for the residents to get feedback on what they object to, what they want, how they want the taxpayers’ monies to be spent… etc.

    This only came about as more and more PJ resident groups formed associations to engage MBPJ. To date, MBPJ has more than 60+ resident associations, 30+ rukun tetangga (sorry, exact figures not with me at the moment) and a host of other NGOs that work with the council.

Most Read (Past 3 Months)

Most Comments (Past 3 Months)

  • None found




  • The Nut Graph


Switch to our mobile site